The U.S. unemployment rate has now topped 10 percent.
This has been predicted for a couple of months now, but still YIKES! Of
course Obama warned us that if we did NOT pass the stimulus bill our
unemployment rate would reach 9 percent. Too bad he didn't tell us that
if we DID pass it, it would exceed 10 percent.
Update: Mark Tapscott makes the argument that unemployment is now a leading indicator.
Unemployment
has hit 10.2 percent, the highest level since the 1983 recession. Obama
administration officials will no doubt try to spin this latest bad
economic news by noting that unemployment is typically a "lagging
indicator." That was true in the old days, but it won't cut it in the
age of the global economy and Internet-driven 24/7 news cycle.
Unemployment may now be something of a leading indicator because
business executives make decisions about whether to invest in new jobs
much more quickly and based on vastly more data.
This is crossposted at Wizbang where Kim Priestap adds an interesting (and scary) thought.
Those in the media are spinning
hard in anticipation of Republican wins in some key races today. Many
news reports will try to lead you to believe the outcome at the polls
should be ignored and the focus should be on Republican divisiveness or
that any Republican wins are outliers, with absolutely no significance
or relation to the mood of the country as a whole. Don't believe it.
There are some close races that could go either way, but if Republicans
do well today it will be significant and the President and Democrats in
Congress know it. It will be very significant for those moderates in
the Congress still deciding which way to vote on health care. They are
looking at opinion polls and they are sticking their fingers up in the
air to figure out which way the political winds are blowing. They
should have a good idea when the polls close tonight.
Even if the GOP picks up some wins today, things could go either way
in 2010. Obviously the more races won today the better for Republicans
looking to next year, but a year is an eternity in politics. If you
don't believe me, just ask President Obama.
Update: I have seen a lot of people quoting Public
Policy Polling's projections on the NY-23 race. I don't know how
accurate they will be, but thought the following quote from Tom Jensen
on their blog was of note:
We think tonight will be very good for Republicans. Two of
the main reasons for that are superior party unity and pretty
overwhelming support from independents.
Ha! What I keep hearing from Democrats today is how Republicans are
divisive and driving moderates and independents away in droves. PPP is
a Democrat polling firm, but their analysis is very good
(even when I don't agree with it, I find it informative and
thoughtful). Evidently Jensen is not following the party line like
those in the media are today. Instead Jensen is reading the poll
results and they are undeniable.
In
NY-23 despite the presence more or less of two Republican candidates on
the ballot, Doug Hoffman is winning 71% of the GOP vote to Bill Owens'
67% of the Democratic vote. Hoffman leads Owens 52-30 with
independents.
In New Jersey Chris Christie is getting 82% of the Republican vote
while Jon Corzine is at 72% of the Democratic vote. Christie leads
52-29 with independents.
In Maine 77% of Republicans support the overturn of gay marriage
while 71% of Democrats are opposed to it. Independents say they'll vote
for it by a 52-46 margin.
In Virginia 94% of Republicans are for Bob McDonnell to 87% of
Democrats for Creigh Deeds. McDonnell is up 63-33 with independents.
More than undeniable, for Democrats, the rates of independent support for the GOP candidates is devastating.
Update II:Tom Elia
has the 2008 election results from New Jersey, Virginia and New York-23
for those who want to make comparison's with tonight's results.
Dan Riehl has a source saying Dede Scozzafava is no longer quietly supporting Democrat Bill Owens, but is making robo calls for him. Dan Karipides has a great post on the Scozzafava NY-23rd drama at Wizbang. The big question Dan Riehl and everyone is asking that we all, of course, know the answer to is whether or not the Republican party or individual contributors get any of their million dollars in campaign contributions back. I think another good question is whether or not Newt Gingrich can get his credibility back.
The pumpkin above was carved a few years ago by my husband. We have a big pumpkin on the front porch this year, but I am not sure whether or not we'll be carving it. Kind of depends on how much time we have. I got a lot of great ideas for pumpkin decorating from my daughter's fall festival at school recently. Each class decorates a pumpkin and sells them via silent auction at the event. Here are a few of my favorites:
Please click below to donate to Valour-IT, a project of Soldiers' Angels which provides adaptive laptops and other technology to those who need it. This is part of their annual fundraiser which runs through November 11. "This spirited competition raises money for technology that reconnects wounded warriors and supports their recovery." Here is some information about this very worthy organization:
Every cent
raised for Project Valour-IT goes directly to the purchase and shipment
of laptops and other technology for severely wounded service members.
As of October 2009, Valour-IT has distributed over 4100 laptops to
severely wounded Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines across the
country, and is now expanding its mission to include other technology that supports physical and psychological recovery.
My most recent columns at American Issues Project address the record high unemployment rates and the priority the President has assigned to that and other issues. Check them out at AIP:
You know that song "I Was Country, When Country Wasn't Cool"? Well, when I read this story at Mediaite, I felt like singing "I liked Red Eye, when Red Eye kind of sucked." Because I did. I watched back when a blogger friend who shall not be named virtually groaned and IM'd "that show is soooo bad" when I mentioned that I was watching it. I then repeated a few of the lines Greg Gutfeld had said on the show and he had to admit they were funny. I think one was about Lindsay "Blowhan."
In the early days the show was pretty raunchy. Actually it still is raunchy, but it is much more consistent and has a faster pace than it did before. I feared it would not stick around long, but thankfully Fox spared the show the same fate as some of their other experiments. The new format and set, including the pre, mid and post show reports
from Andy Levy, are a big improvement over the earlier version.
One reason I love Red Eye is that it shows conservatives in a light not often enough seen on television. It reminds me of a book by Brian Anderson that I blurbed a few years ago -- South Park Conservatives. I can't speak for Brian, but if he were writing the book today I would not be surprised if he called it "Red Eye Conservatives." Liberals appear on Red Eye too, but we are used to seeing them as young and hip (or cool or whatever the adjective is these days). We are not so used to seeing conservatives that way.
I am an insomniac night owl, so I often watch Red Eye in real time, but I suspect they have a lot of viewers who watch on DVR. I have a couple of my favorite episodes saved on my DVR -- one being the episode where David Shuster is mocked mercilessly for his "teabagger" gag. Sorry, it wasn't technically a "gag" (I just couldn't resist the pun). It was supposed to be a news story, but it turned into the best gift Greg Gutfeld could have ever asked for. If you have not seen the show, check it out on Fox News. It isn't everyone's cup of tea, but I absolutely love it and especially love Gutfeld and his adorable mother who does occasional segments as a "senior correspondent." (The woman deserves a spin off, seriously.) Red Eye airs in the middle of the night so if you are not usually up all night be sure to set your DVR. I promise it doesn't suck any more. Not any more so than anything else on television anyway.
If you don't want to hear about the President and First Lady's anniversary date night then you might be a racist. Or something like that. From Mark Silva:
That a simple date at a relatively modestly priced Washington
restaurant to celebrate a wedding anniversary - the first for the first
couple in the White House - could generate as much venom as it has in
these e-pages (see the comments below) on a Sunday suggests something
deeply troubling about the American mood.
Silva notes Afghanistan and the cost to the public as raising ire, but then mentions (you knew it was coming) racism.
Unfortunately,
and this is the most troubling footnote of today's run of criticism for
the Obamas' night out, much of it is clearly inspired by something that
the former president, Jimmy Carter, identified in his recent
characterization of some of the most extreme criticism aimed at Obama
during recent months: The inability of a lot of people to accept a
black man as president.
If you caught Rush Limbaugh on Jay Leno tonight you know that Rush gave a great little lesson on capitalism. I don't have the transcript, but Leno was talking about excessive corporate compensation for those who don't "deserve" it, Wall Street, the bailouts, etc. It is amazing to me that so many have bought into the idea that someone who earned their money legally should not be entitled to keep it if they are not "deserving." The very thought is chilling. I mean who is going to decide who is deserving? How much of their money should they have taken from them, in taxes, forced government mandates, etc.? Instead of school children singing praises to Obama they should be learning some basics about how the government and the economy work.
Tonight driving my nine-year-old daughter to a school event, we passed a new community center that has not opened yet. We started talking about whether or not it might have a pool, or a gym or what else might be hidden behind the cool modern glass facade. My daughter asked if it would cost a lot to go to it. I told her since it is a community center (it is adjacent to a city park) that it would most likely be free, like the park is.
My daughter told me it was not free -- that if the city built it then we all paid for it with our tax money. I asked her how she knew that and she said last year her third grade teacher explained to the class that their families all paid her through their taxes and that when the teacher paid her taxes she was even paying part of her own salary. I am thankful that my child is learning something so fundamental and valuable in her public school. I was especially impressed that she took that lesson and applied it to the community center we were talking about. I just wish the same thing could be said for all the schools in the country.
UPDATE: Watch Rush's full interview with Leno here. He gave a really good little primer on capitalism and it was well received. The audience was fired up and sounded like they agreed with Rush on most things.
UPDATE II: In my latest column at American Issues Project I discuss some reasons people don't seem to understand the American economy better -- including the misinformation and spin they get on a day to day basis from politicians and the news media. Read the column at AIP.
Part of the entry above is crossposted at Wizbang.
If
before the election we had warned that our children in our schools
would be required to learn songs in praise of Barack Hussein Obama, we
would have been called paranoid lunatics. Well, it has happened more
than once already, but this latest case of Obamadoctrination takes the
cake. Just watch the video. The kids are not singing the praises of
this great country, or even the President. They are singing the praises
of "mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama."
Michelle Malkin has lots of details. Be sure to read her post with updates.
Update: Worse than the fact that these kids are
being told to praise "Barack Hussein Obama" or that all the time on
this could have been spent learning math or science or reading or even
a decent song, is this one line:
"He said red, yellow, black or white. All are equal in his sight."
Anyone who says those of us critical of this Obama
worship are overreacting, read that one line that was taught to
schoolchildren. I learned a remarkably similar song when I was a child,
but it was in "Sunday" school in church, not in my elementary school --
"Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in his sight. Jesus
loves the little children of the world."
This creeps me out beyond belief. If my kids were in this school
they would not have stayed there ten minutes after I found out about
this. I wonder how those on the left would have reacted had a similar
song, except with George Bush as the idol of worship, been taught to
their kids in school. Rewind a few weeks and tell me again how those on
the right overreacted to the news that Dear Leader was going to be
addressing the nation's schoolchildren directly.
Update II:Pierre Legrand thinks back to the school speech and writes about a test posted at Smart Girl Nation
that was given in one school which suggests the original content of the
President's speech, before the uproar, was very different from what he
said in the speech he ended up giving.
Update III:Bookworm makes an excellent point
that as bad as this is, at least it is out in the open. For too many
years indoctrination has gone on in the public schools where it was not
so apparent.
The
blogosphere is abuzz with news of Andrew Breitbart's next big story set
to break at noon today. For the best rundown, read all of Mike Flynn
and John Nolte's "pre-game" report at BigGovernment.com. This story began at Big Hollywood with Patrick Courrielche's post
about an NEA conference call back in August in which the artists on the
call were encouraged to support many of President Obama's initiatives.
On
Thursday August 6th, I was invited by the National Endowment for the
Arts to attend a conference call scheduled for Monday August 10th
hosted by the NEA, the White House Office of Public Engagement, and
United We Serve. The call would include "a group of artists, producers,
promoters, organizers, influencers, marketers, taste-makers, leaders or
just plain cool people to join together and work together to promote a
more civically engaged America and celebrate how the arts can be used
for a positive change!"...
Backed by the full weight of President Barack Obama's call to
service and the institutional weight of the NEA, the conference call
was billed as an opportunity for those in the art community to inspire
service in four key categories, and at the top of the list were "health
care" and "energy and environment." The service was to be attached to
the President's United We Serve campaign, a nationwide federal
initiative to make service a way of life for all Americans.
It sounded, how should I phrase it...unusual, that the NEA would
invite the art community to a meeting to discuss issues currently under
vehement national debate. I decided to call in, and what I heard
concerned me.
There is much more to the story than just that call though.
But,
there is even a larger issue that hasn't yet received much attention in
the press. Among the Obama Administration officials on the call were
Buffy Wicks, Office of Public Engagement and the lead White House
official on the President's Serve.Gov initiative to promote national
service. Also on the call was Nell Abernathy, Director of Outreach for
Serve.Gov. One of their main goals on the call, it seems, was to
encourage artists to produce works that would reinforce the President's
call for service; specifically through the Serve.Gov web-portal.
As Dana Loesch recently reported at Big Government, the Serve.Gov
portal funnels citizens to volunteer or service projects connected with
ACORN and other leftist groups. The taxpayer-funded website is evolving
into a cyber-recruitment tool for the progressive movement.
So what did happen on that call? Was the NEA coordinating with the
White House to push their agenda on a group of artists eager for and
reliant upon the NEA for grants, or is the NEA telling the truth that
this call "was not a means to promote any legislative agenda"?
Read the two posts linked above and for more background see the NEA entry at Media Mythbusters.
If I were a betting man, I'd be betting big that the upcoming bombshell will relate to the NEA. You read it here first.
But I think Breitbart's overarching target is even bigger than that:
the national media as a whole. Just as the media was caught flatfooted
by the ACORN scandal, so too will they be rocked back on their heels by
the next bombshell.
If you follow all the links above and track the story as it has
evolved, you will see that there was plenty of "there" there and there
has been plenty of time for the national media to pick up on it. Yet
most in the mainstream media ignored it. I don't think they are going
to be able to ignore this one anymore. Tune in at noon.
Geez,
this one wasn't even thinly disguised. I don't know how often Media
Matters does this kind of thing because I almost never read them, but I
found a link to one of their posts at Digg and clicked on it because the title (Will Fox News hold Beck to its Dan Rather standard?) made me curious.
Here is the relevant part of the post by Jamison Foser:
Fox
News' Glenn Beck recently aired a video indicating that an ACORN
employee shot and killed her husband, without first bothering to verify
whether the husband is, in fact, dead. He isn't. The video is, in other
words, a fraud. But that didn't stop Beck from calling it evidence of
"murder" and perhaps even "premeditated murder." Of a person who is
still alive.
Sean Hannity aired it, too.
Here's a bunch of Fox News "reporters" who are outraged about the murder. Which didn't happen. Because the guy is still alive:
Got
that? Beck was being deceptive because he said the guy was dead. And
that the woman committed murder. Possibly premeditated murder! The
problem is, I saw that segment of Beck and I remembered that after
showing the video, Beck questioned whether or not the husband was even
dead. Media Matters posted the video though, so I wondered if I had
misunderstood what Beck had said. So I watched the following video
posted by Foser at Media Matters:
When
I watched the video Media Matters ran I immediately knew what was up
because they chopped Beck's commentary to bits and curiously left out
the part of it that completely contradicts their claim. I looked for
the Beck video at YouTube to make sure I was not misremembering his
commentary and here is a transcript of what I found.
Glenn Beck:
This is twisted, bizarre, macabre. I mean, is this theater? I'm not a lawyer. I'm not a jury. Um, but gosh
even to me it seems like this is a potential admission of murder and
the way she was describing doing some groundwork beforehand, you know
so everyone in town knew exactly what was going on, a case might be
made for premeditated murder. In fairness, I don't understand
people who stay in abusive relationships. I don't. I get it. I get it.
And maybe a jury might conclude that it was justifiable homicide. I
don't know but we haven't been even able to confirm from the state of
California whether Theresa's husband from ten years ago was killed. Or
if he's dead. Or if she even had a husband. Did she make the story up?
I don't know. Nobody is asking questions. See if the mainstream media will follow this one. This is shocking. It raises serious questions about what is going on inside of ACORN.
I
italicized the portion of the commentary Media Matters provided to
their readers in the mishmash video they put together. The parts they
omitted are not italicized. I put in bold the part of Beck's comments
that directly contradict Media Matters post. It is not like the
comments were made in a different Beck show, or even in a different
segment of Beck's show. They were part of the same paragraph if you
look at the commentary in written transcript. And the pieces they chose
to include in their video came from just before and right after the
part where Beck questioned if the husband was dead. There is NO WAY
that Media Matters could have seen Beck's commentary and not known he
questioned whether or not the husband was even dead. No way. I would
have argued that they could not have been any more deceitful in the way
they presented the material, but I would have been wrong. The
ridiculousness of the post continues.
After showing the video that is chopped off before Beck questions
whether or not the husband is still alive (which obviously negates the
basis of their attack on Beck), Foser posted a bunch of commentary from
Fox News people regarding Dan Rather and the fake Bush memos. Then
Foser asks:
Any chance we'll see this level of outrage directed at Glenn Beck for unquestioningly
airing an apparently fraudulent tape in order to portray an ACORN
employee as a murderer? Beck has, after all, been pretty clear that he
is trying to bring ACORN down.
Again, watch the unedited
video of Beck's segment, the one Media Matters didn't cut off in
midstream, or read the transcript provided above. Beck asked plenty of
questions, including whether or not the man was still alive. But Foser
wrote "Any chance we'll see this level of outrage directed at Glenn
Beck for unquestioningly airing an apparently
fraudulent tape in order to portray an ACORN employee as a murderer?"
Does he think his readers are not smart enough to go find the unedited
video.
I know my readers understand the difference between the nature of
the ACORN video and the Rathergate documents, but for those at Media
Matters I'll explain. The ACORN video is real. Whether or not the woman
was telling the truth when she claimed to have shot her husband has
nothing to do with the authenticity of the video itself unless Foser is
claiming James O'Keefe hired the woman to make up some lines and
deliver them on camera. Or maybe if it was butchered the way Media
Matters did Glenn Beck's commentary video. If neither of those things
happened then how is the ACORN video "apparently fraudulent"? The woman
may be a liar, but if she is indeed an employee of ACORN (which I don't
believe has been disputed), she was caught on camera, in an ACORN
office, giving advice to someone claiming to be a pimp trying to open a
brothel of underage illegal immigrant girls about how to hide the true
nature of his business in order and evade taxes and be eligible for
assistance. Glenn Beck was shocked by the statements from the ACORN
employee, in an ACORN office, and asked a series of questions,
including one about her claims about shooting her husband.
Is the argument that everything is cool if the woman was lying about
killing her husband? I have heard that one floating around -- that if
the woman's husband is not dead then the tapes are fake or fraudulent
or irrelevant. I would argue that it is much worse if ACORN hired a
woman who would lie to people coming into their office about killing
her husband, than if they hired a woman who (possibly in self defense)
shot and killed her husband.
Regarding the Dan Rather comparison -- do I really, seriously, have
to explain how that is different from supposedly seasoned professionals
at CBS news and 60 Minutes putting on the air documents that were
supposedly 30 years old, but were obviously produced with a relatively
recent version of a Word processing program (superscript and all)? I
won't get into all the ways CBS failed to do due diligence on the
documents that were so obviously inauthentic, but it is interesting
that those on the left are comparing the ACORN video to the Rathergate
docs in an effort to save ACORN's bacon, or to save their President who
has a history with ACORN. To me it sounds like desperate, grabbing at
straws, how the heck are we gonna spin this one, crazy talk.
For those who would like to see the unedited version of Beck's commentary in full, here is the video:
This is the best news I have heard in a long time. Matt Burden, of milblog Blackfive
fame, is one of my favorite people. He is passionate about his
country's future, but is also always thoughtful and reasonable. He is
entering a new phase of service now.
For
more than 20 years, I've served my country, fighting to protect and
preserve the American freedoms, rights, and values that make this
country great, first as an Airborne Soldier - and then as one of the
leaders of the Internet political revolution that has held arrogant and
corrupt leaders accountable from city halls all the way to Washington
D.C.
After much thought and one helluva exploratory committee, the green
light is on and I'm ready - I have decided to run for office. I will
change Illinois' political landscape and culture of corruption. But I
can't do it without your help.
Please help Matt.
He is one of the good guys. He has shown his commitment to his country
time and time again, and soon, hopefully, he will be allowed to show
that commitment through service to his congressional district. Matt is
asking for a mere $10 to help him in his run. If you can, please send
some love his way.
The post below is what I found on the front of Daily Kos today. If you want to see just how confused, upset and downright afraid liberals are of the tea party movement, look no farther.
Using the name "teabaggers" in an attempt
to diminish the tea party movement? Check. Trying to downplay the
number of protesters by mocking them as "thousands of millions"? Check.
Saying tea party protesters are racist? Check.
They have to mock and exaggerate and call names because if they look at the crowds honestly they'll have to cry.
Here is what I don't think you'll be seeing on the front page of the liberal blogs:
Update II: More from Melissa Clouthier on liberal reaction to the 9/12 protests. Rick Moran on how the dispute over numbers is meant to mask the history being made.
Update III: No number of pictures, even those appearing in the Obama loving media, even those showing crowds that appear every bit as large as those at O's inauguration, will convince some people. I really hope they continue to live in denial. It will make the November 2010 election results even more of a shock.
Update IV: Check out the entry currently posted at Wikipedia for the 9/12 march on DC:
On September 12, 2009, over 75,000 Tea Party protesters gathered in Washington, D.C. to march from Freedom Plaza to the United States Capitol.[62][63]. While hundreds of thousands of people indicated that they planned to attend[64], and as many as 30,000 registered in advance [65], actual turnout was estimated by many as far less[66][67][68]. DC Park Police reportedly called an estimate of 30,000 "generous".[69]
"The
pictures of airplanes flying into buildings, fires burning, huge
structures collapsing, have filled us with disbelief, terrible sadness,
and a quiet, unyielding anger. These acts of mass murder were intended
to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat. But they have failed;
our country is strong. A great people has been moved to defend a great
nation. Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest
buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts
shattered steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve."
- President George W. Bush, September 11, 2001 Address to the Nation
In the past Republicans have been criticized by Democrats anytime they reminded the country
of the attacks of September 11. It is not possible to
honor the sacrifice of those who ran into the buildings when everyone
else was running out, unless we remember, and remind the country, of what happened that day.
It is important not only to remember those who lost their lives on that day, but to remember the kind of insanity and hatred that led the hijackers to murder.
"The people who did this to us are monsters; the people who
cheered them have hate-sickened minds. One reason they can cheer is
that they know we would never do to them what their heroes did to us,
even though we could, a thousand times worse. They know that when we
hunt down the monsters, we will try hard not to harm the innocent.
Those are the handcuffs we willingly wear, because for all our flaws,
we are a decent people." -- Dave Barry.
Whether criticized for it or not, I think it is also important that
we remember what it felt like on that day. I was watching the Today
Show and saw the second plane hit the tower in real time. I remember
shock, disbelief, and sadness, but most of all a vulnerability that did
not exist on September 10. That feeling stayed with me for quite some
time. I had felt it to a much lesser extent when the WTC was bombed
years earlier, but 9/11/01 was, obviously, on a level never before seen
in our nation's history. When I heard the announcement that the
Pentagon had been hit as well, and then saw video of the gaping hole,
my only thought was "we have been attacked and we are at war."
That feeling has faded a good deal over the years since there have
been no new attacks on our soil, but we must remember that there are
still people in this world who would like nothing better than to see a
repeat of 2001. President Bush said "these acts shattered steel, but
they cannot dent the steel of American resolve." I fear the American
resolve has been dented a bit. Hopefully taking time today to remember
the events of September 11, 2001 will help firm up that resolve.
Over the past few years I have done several 9/11 tributes and memorials
-- the preceding two paragraphs were repeated from something I wrote
last year on 9/11. Here are links to some of those posts: September 11, 2008, September 11, 2007, September 11, 2006
Part of the Department of Education’s suggested lesson plan to go
along with President Obama’s speech to school children this week was
for teachers to ask students, “Why is it important that we listen to
the President and other elected officials… Why is what they say
important?”
A better question might have been, “Why is it important that elected
officials listen to the people they represent? Why is what the people
say important?”
So much of the President’s current problem with his approval ratings
can be traced back to these simple questions. Whether it be the
stimulus package, the bailouts and control over private industries, a
growing deficit or the health care debate, many Americans believe those
in power don’t care what they think or what they have to say.
I did not take my children out of school today, nor did I write a
note excusing them from listening to Obama's speech to the
schoolchildren of America. This morning I told my daughters to be very
respectful during the speech and that we could talk about it when they
got home. I didn't make them write a report or anything, but my 4th
grader gave me a report of sorts in the car on the way home and I asked
her if she wanted to type it for me. She was excited to do it and
started the first sentence as a report, but I told her not to do
anything formal, just simply to type out what she told me in the car.
She cut it short to go play with a friend before dinner, but this is
what she wrote.
OnSeptember8th, 2009, I watchedPresident Obama give his speech. Some kids got a note from
their parents and got to do fun stuff instead. I was very jealous. I listened to him talk about school and how it
was the first day of school (although it wasn’t) and other boring stuff for
FIFTEEN MINUTES! To a kid that’s a
looong time in school.
During the speech, my friend and her friend were talking,
and my teacher said they were being very disrespectful to the president, the
leader of our armed forces (blah, blah, blah and some other stuff).
Later, in
the library, a kid in my class said that he was very happy that Obama beat
McCain. I asked him why. He said (and this is the funny part) that he would
bring back slavery and raise taxes! I
said how do you know that? He said, “Because
I watched the news” and I said “You don’t watch the news if you think that!”
and it was basically back and forth from there. But when he said he said HE knew more than MY
MOM, it was a fight worthy of a war. I
was so mad I broke my pencil and later, my crayon.
The dispute ended there, thankfully far short of a
war. The blah, blah, blah was not meant to be disrespectful, that is
just what she says when she can't remember exactly what else was said.
I provided the italics because that part of the story was what I found
most shocking. I have not yet talked to my 8th grader about the speech
because she had cheer practice after school. I didn't get a call from
her teacher or the principal yet though, so I assume she didn't get
into any trouble (of the pencil breaking variety or otherwise).
Update: Get a middle school student's reaction (and her mom's) at Bookworm Room.
In my new column at Townhall I explain why I believe conservatives who were unsuccessful reforming the mainstream media, are now replacing it.
What is happening now is something those in the conservative
movement might not have ever dreamed possible. Although the goal of
reforming the mainstream media has not been achieved, something more
amazing has. In some ways the outlets conservatives hoped would provide
balance to the mainstream media, are becoming the mainstream.
Something happened last week that underscored this phenomenon.
News outlets like the New York Times and NBC and ABC evening newscasts refused to cover
the revelations surrounding President Obama’s “green jobs” czar, Van
Jones. When those revelations of Jones signing a 911 “Truther”
petition, calling Republicans a—holes and claiming white polluters were
poisoning black communities reached the point that Jones was forced to
resign, some of those news outlets had to cover the resignation. What
should cause them embarrassment and damage any shred of credibility
they have left as reliable news sources is that many of them had
neglected to inform their audiences of any of the events leading up to
the resignation.
I saw Ed Mitchell on the Food Network tonight on Throwdown with Bobby Flay in a battle of BBQ ribs and beans. I remember eating at Mitchell's BBQ in Wilson and loved the collards, banana pudding and sweet potatoes. After many problems the Wilson restaurant was closed down, but Mitchell is in Raleigh now at The Pit, which is in a restored warehouse downtown. I have not eaten there, but after seeing those BBQ ribs and beans I will have to make a trip. He has one of the best websites I have ever seen for a restaurant. The food looks a little fancier than I remember it in Wilson, but I am sure it tastes every bit as good.
I
don't think most Democrats realize what a bad place they are in right
now. There is still over a year before the mid-term elections, but
unless there is a significant change in direction they are going
straight over the cliff. I'm not saying that. Charlie Cook is. In somewhat different words.
Listening
to two briefings -- one by a Democratic pollster who had just conducted
a survey for a group favoring health care reform, the other by a
Republican pollster more skeptical of the reform plans -- I felt as if
I were hearing a pair of reports by the National Transportation Safety
Board on the same plane crash. But in sorting through the problems
facing President Obama and congressional Democrats, focusing too
narrowly on their disastrous handling of health care would be a
mistake...
...With 14 months to go before the 2010 midterm election, something
could happen to improve the outlook for Democrats. However, wave
elections, more often than not, start just like this: The president's
ratings plummet; his party loses its advantage on the generic
congressional ballot test; the intensity of opposition-party voters
skyrockets; his own party's voters become complacent or even depressed;
and independent voters move lopsidedly away. These were the
early-warning signs of past wave elections. Seeing them now should
terrify Democrats.
"Terrify." I didn't say it.
Charlie Cook did. I really don't think Democrats are fully feeling it
yet though. I think they are in shock and denial. And they are so far
to the left that I don't know if they are going to be able to move fast
enough to the center to save their backsides. Obama has time, but all
those congressmen and women facing voters next year are going to have
to seriously boogie to get there.
Today I will join a couple of my favorite North Carolina bloggers, John
Hawkins and Scott Elliott, on the Bill LuMaye show on AM 680 WPTF.
This will be the first radio show I have done "in studio" so I am
looking forward to getting a behind the scenes look. If you are in the
Raleigh listening area tune in at 4:10 p.m. If you aren't you can go to
the WPTF website to listen online.
I have a new column up at Townhall.com, Obama's Kryptonite. In it I discuss some of the reasons Obama's approval numbers have taken a dive. John Hawkins has a great column at Townhall today about five liberal lies about Obamacare. There is lots of other good stuff there too, including one of my favorite columnists -- David Limbaugh. Check it out.
If you have been reading my blogging since 2004 you might remember "Miracle Child" Molly Kate.
Her mom tells her story and her reasons for opposing any form of
government run health care system in an open letter to President Obama (posted at Hot Air). Here is an excerpt:
Our
daughter has hydrocephalus and this chronic and incurable condition has
required 58 surgeries and numerous tests and hospitalizations through
out her 22 years. I can speak to the current controversy over "health
care reform" with our long experience with American health care and
insurance.
I believe our current health care system, even while riddled with
imperfections and purposeful corruption (mostly done by the
government), is the absolute best in the world. I would not trade one
second of our experience for any other alternative system here, or
anywhere else on the planet. And I'd pay again every cent of the
hundreds of thousands of dollars we (and our insurance company, a
private company we contracted with by choice) paid to keep our daughter
alive. No one ever questioned our choice to do everything possible to
save our daughter. We did not have to answer to any bureaucrat why she
was less valuable or viable than any other child or debate the merits
or costs of countless surgeries for a condition that would certainly
require more. When she needed care, she got it immediately, without
applying to an office for approval. When we ran out of insurance (at
surgery 37), we fought for another way and got it through a group
healthcare plan for our business. Which had the advantage of giving our
15 employees health care too...there are silver linings even in the
worse situations. We gave up many things for the rest of our family and
our future to ensure her health care. But, really, we would do it all
again.
Fred Barnes has a nice tribute to his friend, Robert Novak, who passed away yesterday at the age of 78.
It’s not too much to call Novak journalism’s last honest man in
Washington. Ideologically, he was conservative, the more so the older
he grew. He was quite up front about this. But he didn’t cover for his
allies or mistreat his adversaries. If a conservative Republican
disappointed him, Novak would let you know.
He was unique in another way: his reporting. His column, which he
wrote for four decades with Rowland Evans, had a slant and plenty of
analysis. Its strength, however, consisted of big scoops or nuggets of
fresh reporting. No other columnist could match this. Appearing three
days a week in the Washington Post, it was a column that couldn’t be ignored.
The relentless, remorseless reporter -- the Prince of Darkness, as
he fashioned himself publicly -- was only one side of Bob Novak. The
other was a kind man, a patriot, a doting grandfather, a pal of liberal
and conservative journalists alike, and a mentor to many younger men in
the media, including me.
The latest from Rasmussen has got to be bad news for the White House.
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday
shows that 28% of the nation's voters now Strongly Approve of the way
that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty percent
(40%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index
rating of -12. That’s the lowest rating yet recorded for President
Obama (see trends).
Rusty at Jawa
has exclusive information on the suspected terrorists arrested in North
Carolina this week. It is amazing how much information jihadists are
willing to post on their social networking sites.
More
on the banality of terror. You should read it for the context in
understanding the federal indictments against Ziyad Yaghi, Mohammad
Omar Aly Hussain, and six others.
At first glance Yaghi's Facebook account seemed so ordinary. Hence
why all his friends are shocked, neighbors all describe the
ringleader's family as nice people, and the "banality of evil"
reference. But on a deeper analysis of "hidden" information, it becomes
clear that Yaghi had jihadi aspirations for some time.
I think there's a joke worthy of Jeff Foxworthy here. If the very first thing you write on your Facebook page is ..
Asalamualaikum, if your a mulsim (sic, "Muslim) welcome but if ur a munafiq (arabic: hypcrite) im a kill you
... then you might be a jihadi.
Here is a link to his earlier post about the stuff found on Ziyad Yaghi's Facebook page.
I apologize for disappearing for a few weeks. I have been traveling for the past three weeks. First to the NC coast, then to Dallas, then Oklahoma. I have spent a lot of time in a car (a crew cab truck actually) and saw a lot of the country -- the really hot, wonderful south and southwest part anyway. I'll post a few pics if I can remember how to do it. I hope everyone is enjoying the summer.
This is some great video from CNN.
It is of an interview with a car dealer who is giving away AK-47s with
truck purchases. The interviewer just doesn't "get" this guy or his
slogan of "God, guns, guts and American pickup trucks," but my bet is
that the majority of Americans would think he makes perfect sense.
Here is a link to the Patterico post everyone else has linked already. It is a contrast between the Twitter posts from Iran and those from Mark Knoller covering Obama's ice cream trip. It gave me chills.
North
Korea warned South Korea and the United States on Wednesday that
Seoul's participation in a U.S.-led program to intercept ships
suspected of carrying weapons of mass destruction is equal to a
declaration of war.
South Korea announced its participation in the U.S.-led program on
Tuesday, one day after North Korea defiantly conducted a nuclear test,
drawing international criticism.
The North's military said in a statement that it will respond with
"immediate, strong military measures" against any attempt to stop and
search North Korean ships under the Proliferation Security Initiative.
"N.
Korea says it is no longer bound to the armistice which ended the war
and says the peninsula will soon be returned to the state of war."
Not quite 3 a.m. in the White House, but close enough, right? The
only thing I know with pretty perfect certainty right now is that BHO
has absolutely no idea what to do. Let's hope (a) his advisers have
some plans and (b) he picks a good plan from the options presented to
him.
When Obama is working to triple deficits and takeover the banks and
the auto manufacturers, etc. is the time to hope he fails. When it
comes to dealing with an international situation like the one we see
today, is the time to hope he doesn't fail. To PRAY he doesn't fail.
Let's hope the teleprompter is in good working order. And let's pray he
doesn't really believe all that stuff he has said over the past couple
of years about trying to reason with madmen.
Forget
Obama's grabbing the banks and the car companies. Forget his eleven
trillion dollars of new debt for the next generation. Forget his
egomania. Eight years after the jihad assault of 9/11, 2001, on New
York City and Washington, D.C., we are back to national life or death.
Americans were suckered into believing that the world was suddenly a
safe place, and elected a grossly unqualified Chicago pol to lead the
nation, because he looked good on TV. That is a mistake we may come to
bitterly regret.
Every cent
raised for Project Valour-IT goes directly to the purchase and shipment
of laptops and other technology for severely wounded service members.
As of October 2009, Valour-IT has distributed over 4100 laptops to
severely wounded Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines across the
country, and is now expanding its mission to include 
